Category Archives: fun



Having recently acquired a copy Tagalicious, it seemed time to look at the MP3 tag file programs again. I’m astonished at how many hits these postings have gotten.

If you’re coming to the blog for the first time, here are links to the previous posts:

CoverScout, Pollux, TuneUp

Genre Tagging: Pollux vs. TuneUp

Pollux vs. TuneUp — Update

As mentioned in previous posts, CoverScout is out of the running. It only does cover art, it creates a large database, and it’s too expensive for the limited functionality. Through the course of the past year, Pollux also dropped out of the running. In the year that I had it, I believe there was one update. I’m not going to pay an annual fee ($10/year) for a product that appears to have ceased development a year ago. It might be different if the program were outstandingly effective and bug free. No such luck.

So, TuneUp has remained my go-to program for MP3 tagging. They update it regularly and seem to have an actual interest in their customers. Things have changed a bit, in the last year; they have broadened the offering a bit since I first purchased TuneUp. They have now added DeDuper, which claims to eliminate duplicate songs, based on the acoustic fingerprint of the songs. A lifetime license to the entire bundle is now $49.95. As a loyal TuneUp Gold customer, I am allowed to purchase DeDuper as an add-on for $19.95 (annual) or $29.95 (lifetime). My reward is to pay more for the bundle than a new customer will pay. I just don’t see that happening. So, I have 25 DeDupes and then I’m done. I’ll probably get to it eventually but duplicate songs aren’t that big a deal to me (certainly not a big enough deal to spend $30).

Now comes Tagalicious from The Little App Factory. I have iRip and RipIt from The Little App Factory and have found both programs to be very useful and very stable, so it made sense to give Tagalicious try. At $19.95 for a license that is not an annuity (for the developer), it is priced well. Also, it is available for Mac AND PC (as is TuneUp).

What do you get with Tagalicious?

– MP3 tagging
– Cover art
– Lyrics

Like Pollux, Tagalicious sweetens the deal by providing access to lyrics.


You couldn’t get much simpler than the preference settings in Tagalicious. It’s nice that there is a setting to leave purchased songs alone; I don’t recall that being an option in the other apps. The other setting lets you determine whether it’s the new or old tag that is selected for updating by default. By that, I mean that you’re deciding which values will be used for the update.


How Does it Work?

When you run Pollux, it inserts itself in the menu bar. You select songs in iTunes and then use the menu bar to initiate the search. TuneUp launches with iTunes. You select the songs you want to tag and drag them to the TuneUp window. Tagalicious launches as an app. It looks at your iTunes database and presents your playlists. It also presents a number of its own Smart Playlists, based on your library:

– Music — every song in iTunes
– Updated Music — anything that Tagalicious has modified
– Tagged Music — songs that already have tags
– Untagged Music — nekkid songs


Select any of the lists and you’re ready to get started. It took me a few minutes to realize that Tagalicious activates when you select a song (or collection of songs). This is different than the way TuneUp and Pollux work but I liked it.

When you pick a list or library view, there are two viewing options: a cover art view and a list view. Cover art view shows the album cover and the song, which is attractive, but not terribly useful.

For list view, here are the view option settings that allow you to pick the sort order, sort by tag, and viewable tags. Another nice feature is that you can toggle back and forth between the original settings and the Tagalicious settings while in list view. This is the most transparent interface I’ve seen, allowing you to easily see how Tagalicious is performing against your current tags/tagging solution.


If you select a single song, you get a view of the current tag information presented next to the values that Tagalicious has found:


This is a feature that I really like about Tagalicious. It shows you the existing tag info, as well as the suggested tag info (as determined by Tagalicious). Compared to Pollux or TuneUp, this is a superior method. With Pollux and TuneUp, you must turn off the tags that you do not want updated. With Tagalicious, you click on the tag information you want to update (it’s probably more clear if you note the highlighted fields in the screenshot above). When you click “Send to iTunes” it updates the highlighted fields. This allows you to mix and match between existing tags and the new tags. This is a much more flexible option, since you don’t have to turn off a particular tag for all songs. How sweet is that?

As you can see in the above pic, you can select which values you prefer for each song in your library. This isn’t your only option. Under the Tracks menu, you can also toggle between the original and new values by tag:


Another useful piece of information provided in list view is an icon that shows the status of each song:


The green check means that the song has been updated. The red exclamation indicates that nothing was found for that song. The blue lock shows that the song is a DRM song and cannot be updated. The orange icon means that tag information has been found for that song. No icon shows that the song hasn’t been touched yet. It’s quite handy that the list view can be sorted by this value, allowing you to deal with all songs with the same status at once if you want.

TuneUp vs. Tagalicious

As mentioned above, I did not renew my Pollux license. This means that the comparison you’ll see is between TuneUp and Tagalicious. To compare the apps, I created a playlist comprised of 101 songs. I tried to provide a wide variety of genres, as well as throwing in songs that I know are problematic. There were two runs. The first run, used the songs with their existing tags (mostly provided by Pollux or TuneUp). For the second run, I selected the songs in the playlist and cleared all the fields (except song name).

First Round

In the testing, it was clear that Tagalicious was much faster than TuneUp. However, I suspect that this is because TuneUp is checking so many more sites for cover art (based on the number of alerts I got from Little Snitch, TuneUp must check 2 or 3 times what Tagalicious checks…at least). In the first round, Tagalicious processed the songs in 50 seconds, as compared to 3 minutes, 40 seconds for TuneUp. After the first pass, Tagalicious had tagged 50 of 101 songs. After two additional passes through the songs, it had tagged 77. Although I’m not clear why, Tagalicious seemed to improve over time.

After 3:42, TuneUp had tagged 98 songs. What’s interesting is that two of those songs (two songs that I have NEVER had identified properly), were properly tagged by Tagalicious. For the record, those songs were “Rice Rice Baby” by Weird Al and “Choppin’ Broccoli” by Dana Carvey.

In terms of tagging completions, TuneUp took round 1 (although it was slower in one pass than three passes through Tagalicious).

Second Round

For round 2, I cleared all MP3 info from the 101 songs except the song name.

Tagalicious processed the 101 songs in 27 seconds. It tagged 79 songs.

TuneUp took 3.5 minutes and tagged 75 songs. This suggests (to me) that TuneUp uses more than just the audio fingerprint to tag songs. It seems that it did better in round 1 because it had more information to start with.

Both apps had issues with songs recorded through Snowtape. I suppose this makes sense, since it isn’t always easy to get a clean cut on the songs (sometimes you just can’t manage to avoid overlap between the new song and the previous song or commercial). However, Tagalicious seemed to fare a bit better with Snowtape recordings.

Bottom Line

Tagalicious is much faster than TuneUp. I’m sure this is affected by TuneUp’s additional functionality (finding YouTube videos, concerts nearby, and a dogged determination to find cover art) but Tagalicious is also getting song lyrics in that time (functionality not provided by TuneUp). I like the way the program presents itself and the way the fact that it is standalone. It doesn’t seem to fill up the hard drive like CoverScout and, so far, seems more stable than Pollux or TuneUp. It also, in my opinion, provides a better, more informative, more flexible UI than the other apps.

TuneUp is better at finding cover art. As mentioned before, it seems to have a wide array of sites it checks for covers. Also, if you want deep genre tagging, there is no question that TuneUp is the winner. I have TuneUp set at level 2, which is 250 genres. Tagalicious is much less granular. Below, is a sampling of the results from both apps, with TuneUp first (I tried to get them side by side but my theme just doesn’t have room for it).



If you aren’t too concerned about genre tagging, Tagalicious is faster and provides lyrics at a much better price point.

If you want very detailed genre tagging, I have not found anything that can touch TuneUp. In the 101 song sample, Tagalicious produced 21 different genre tags while TuneUp provided 49. In terms of cover art, I would also have to give the edge to TuneUp. It’s clear they are checking a huge number of sites to find appropriate cover art and they were able to provide cover art that Tagalicous couldn’t find.

Tagalicious is currently at rev 1.1.3 and is already a good app, especially in terms of speed and interface. If The LIttle App Factory continues to work on cover art and genre tagging, they will have a very strong contender on their hands.

Both products provide a trial with a limited number of tags. You owe it to yourself to try both to see which app fits your needs.


iWow 3D


To be fair, I was skeptical of this device when I ordered it. It’s certainly something that I would like to work as promised but I haven’t found anything that really does the trick thus far. However, given how easy Amazon makes returns, I was willing to take the risk; it’s tough to find great new stuff without taking a few chances. So, I added it to my cart and hoped for the best.


When I pulled it out of the box, I couldn’t help thinking it looked like a manta ray. The device plugs into the 30-pin connector on your iPod/Touch/iPad and claims to dramatically improve the sound you’re getting through your headphones. Here is what the manufacturer says:

“Hear What You’ve Been Missing
SRS iWOW 3D dynamically locates audio cues buried deep down in existing recorded or streamed multimedia content to restore sonic fidelity to audio files, ensuring the user experiences music, videos, and games with renewed clarity and detail–the way the artist originally intended.”

Plug it into your Apple music player of choice, plug your headphones/earbuds into it, and you’re ready to go. Although it is a hardware solution, a free app is available in the App Store that claims to offer further enhancements. Just search on SRS iWow.


The tail that you plug your earbuds/headphones into seems rugged enough but the body of the manta seems more delicate. The plastic that encases the electronics feels thin and the seam between the halves looks and feels like it would be easy to pop apart. The massive cyclopean circle you see on the face of the body is an on/off switch that lights up when activated, which brings me to my next complaint.

Let’s take a hypothetical example. Say a guy had a few Amazon certificates that he had been saving and was intrigued enough to want to order the manta. He doesn’t talk to his wife about it, he just orders it and calls it good. Several days later, it arrives. He plugs everything together and waits for evening because he likes to listen to music in bed, while dozing off to sleep. Bed time arrives. The lights are off and he grabs his iPod Touch, pops his Monster Turbine earbuds in, and turns the Touch on. Immediately, a glow fills the room. The circle is a homing beacon of some sort. It makes E.T.’s finger look like match light in the darkness. It illuminates with a brightness that feels like it is tanning his panicked face. If you have a Kindle (see Kindle review below…seriously, you should get one) but haven’t purchased a lighted case yet, this baby will light up your reading surface just fine. It’s at the point where the hypothetical wife, who has no issue with the Kindle light, opens her eyes and says, “What in the hell is that? Why do you have a flashlight in bed?”

OK, there is some hyperbole here, but not as much as you might expect. That little bastard is bright.

As mentioned, that circle serves as an on/off button. This leads us to my next complaint. With iWow Premium iTunes plugin (or the Bongiovi DPS plugin), you have the ability to compare the enhanced sounds with the standard iTunes output by toggling the software on and off. Not so with this bad boy. When you turn it off, it actually dis-enhances the sound to such a degree that toggling the device on and off convinces that the enhancement sounds 1000% better. (Sorry for the made up word but unenhance suggests that it does nothing.) The fact is that the sound coming through while the gadget is off is so notably bad, and the volume so low, that you decide you have just found nirvana. You won’t believe how much better the music sounds with the manta activated. Before you get all excited, though, listen to music for a few seconds with the manta turned off. Then, disconnect the manta, plug your earbuds into the standard stereo out jack of your player, and listen again. You will, again, be surprised at how much better things sound. It would probably be over the top to suggest that the manufacturer knowingly uses the circuitry in an off state to completely butcher the music, but it is a brilliant way to make users believe they have stumbled onto a hella good gadget.

Next off, we have the fact that the manta takes over the 30-pin connector AND blocks the headphone jack. This means:

  • You can’t conveniently compare the outputs
  • You can’t charge your player while using the iWow 3D

While using the iWow, I did not notice a significant battery drain, which actually surprised me a bit. Given the retina-searing, hallogen-beating lamp on it, I expected the battery gauge to visibly drop while I watched it. (Slight hyperbole warning).

But, back to the sound. Does the iWow make the music sound better? Yes. Does it enhance the music in any way, providing more depth, clarity, and detail? I don’t think so. Maybe there would be a marked improvement with stock earbuds but with the earbuds I use (see reviews elsewhere on this site), the music just sounded louder. It might have kicked up the treble a little bit but I could not confidently say that the music had opened up in any way.


Unfortunately, I can’t provide screenshots from the app because you have to have the manta plugged in to reach most of the functionality and mine is packed up and ready for return to Amazon (spoiler alert). I can tell you that it offers music trivia, a link to the SRS blog, and a link to the SRS site.

With the device plugged in, you can:

  • Toggle the software on and off
  • Tailor the software for different environments
    • Headphones
    • Speakers
    • Car
  • Advanced settings
    • Wide Surround
    • Deep Bass
    • High Treble

None of the settings really seemed to alter the music that much. With eyes closed, I don’t believe you would quickly differentiate between the different software settings.

As I write this, the iWow 3D has six reviews on Amazon. All give it 5/5. It may be that I’m just a tone deaf dipshit, but I don’t think so. If those users compare the output by just toggling the iWow on and off via the hardware button, they will absolutely be impressed. The problem is that the resulting sound when the iWow is turned off is NOTHING like the sound you get through the headphone jack. A little more testing might change their mind. As always, your mileage may vary. If you have experience with the iWow (positive or negative), please feel free to post.

Don’t Want No Nekkid Kindle


Actually, this title is a bit misleading. Reading with the Kindle 3 au naturel is a very comfortable and pleasant way to read. The weight and size of the Kindle 3 make it quite easy to read one-handed, even while lying down. Given the choice, I probably prefer reading on the Kindle without a cover. However, I’m a bit protective of my gadgets and I try to keep them in good shape. Our iPod Touches all have BodyGuardz or Invisible Shields (my BlackBerry was in service for three years and fell off a moving car once–when I retired it for the iPhone 4, it was still in immaculate condition thanks to the BodyGuardz cover).

So, despite enjoying the Kindle in its native state, I decided I wanted to be more careful with it. It can take days to go through all the available accessories on Amazon and it is a bit overwhelming/frustrating. The variety of styles, colors, and materials borders on mind-numbing. After hours of looking through page after page and reading scores of reviews, I concluded that a light would be useful. I looked at the Mighty Bright, the M-Edge e-Luminator, and the Kandle but didn’t want ANOTHER thing to carry around. A case that had a light and would protect my precious Kindle while it’s stuffed in my computer bag seemed like the best alternative.

Apparently, I’m cheap about accessories because the thought of dishing out $60 for a case to protect a $139 device really chapped my a$$. But, the thought of tossing a naked Kindle into my computer bag and then jamming it into an airplane cargo bin is just too frightening. Since Target carries the Amazon case, I decided to get it there so I could return it if I didn’t like it.

The case has a nice pebbled leather exterior with an elastic strap to hold it shut, a groove for the strap, and a leather tab on the strap to make it easier to grab. Although I’m a little concerned about the strap losing its tension, so far so good. When you fold the cover back, the strap can be used to hold it tight against the back of the Kindle, making it a little more convenient to hold. The inside of the cover has a soft microfiber that will certainly help protect against scratches. The interior spine has two metal tabs that are used to lock the Kindle into the case and to provide power for the light. Because I’m concerned about those metal tabs beginning to carve out the soft plastic of the Kindle, I leave the Kindle in the cover all the time. It’s a little disappointing but reading with the cover on makes it feel more like a book.

The light pulls out from the upper right corner of the back. It has a plastic edge that can be a little tricky to grab with your thumb but it’s not too bad. The light consists of three LED’s that shine onto the front of the Kindle. The light degrades a bit as you move down the page but even the bottom is bright enough for me to read. There are a number of things about this case that make it very nice:

  • The LED’s illuminate the front of the Kindle but that’s about it. If you read in bed and aren’t sleeping alone, your partner will hardly even notice it.
  • The light is powered by the Kindle battery, so there is no issue with remembering to charge something else.
  • Because it’s powered by the Kindle battery, if you fall asleep while reading, the light will go off when the Kindle goes into sleep mode.

So far, using the light for 5-6 hours/week hasn’t put an appreciable dent in the battery life.

If you’re in the market for a case and would like the benefit of an integrated light, there isn’t much competition for the Amazon cover with light. It’s a high quality case and the pull out light is extremely convenient without being a battery killer. Check it out.

The Great Rock ‘n’ Roll Kindle


Let’s get this out right away… I love books: the smell, the look, the feel. A new book is always a treasure. A bookstore is a magical place with so much potential for knowledge or challenge or excitement. I am bibliophile and proud of it; most of my books look as if they’ve never been read, even after I have finished them.

When the first Kindle arrived, I could not have been more underwhelmed. The size, shape and placement of the page buttons was horrible, leading to frequent accidental page turning. The clunky design of the thing made it look like they were channeling the creators of the Commodore 64. The e ink was ok but page refreshes were slow. In short, I had no interest in ever getting one of the things. A good friend had one of the originals and rarely used it. After losing it on a business trip, he had concluded that he wouldn’t bother replacing it. That is, until his daughter bought a Kindle 3 with her babysitting money. Now, he reads constantly and, I’m willing to bet, if he were to lose the new Kindle, he would order a replacement that same day.

Having never seen the Kindle 3, I was no more interested in it than the previous generations. I had gotten to the point where I used the Kindle app on my Touch to read while out and about. It wasn’t great but it was a way of wasting time while waiting for a haircut or an oil change. When I was able to move from a BlackBerry to the iPhone 4, my time spent reading in the Kindle app began to increase substantially. The retina display is so crisp and clean that the reading experience was much improved. It seemed to me that with the retina display, I had found a reading solution that obviated the need for a Kindle, a Nook, or any of the other e-reader variants.

Then, Christmas morning, I found myself the owner of a shiny new Kindle 3. It was so small and light. The screen was so sharp and responsive. Although I did decide to buy a case (which we’ll talk about later), reading with a naked Kindle 3 is a delight. The whole experience shocked me; I couldn’t believe how much I liked this little device. There is no question that I am reading more now than I have read in a very long time.



The Kindle 3 is 7.5” x 4.8” x 0.335” and weighs 8.5 ounces. With that, you get a 6” diagonal E Ink Pearl screen. They claim that it is 21% smaller and 17% lighter and I believe it. The screen is the same size as the original but offers better contrast and faster page changes. To me, the delay now is less than you would get turning a physical page. Put me down as one who is drinking the E Ink Kool-Aid. I occasionally get eye strain while working on the computer or reading on the iPhone. After having ready 8-10 books over the last six weeks, I have not experienced a single instance of eye strain while reading on the Kindle.

The placement for the page turn buttons is much better. Accidental page flipping is greatly reduced over the original but the shape and location of the new buttons makes for very convenient page turning regardless of how you hold the unit–assuming you hold it more or less like a book. The keyboard buttons have a nice feel but, despite being a former BlackBerry thumb-typing whiz, I typically type with my index finger on this device. The shape of the buttons and the greater separation between buttons just doesn’t work for me to try thumb-typing.

The wi-fi was very fast and easy to setup. If you can setup the wi-fi on your smart phone or Touch, you’ll have no problem with the Kindle. I can’t speak about the 3G because I do not have that version. When I first received it, I decided I was going to return it and upgrade to the 3G version. Amazon was more than helpful and I quickly had it all boxed up and ready to go. A friend then pointed out that with space for 3500 books, it seems unlikely that I would get caught without any books while traveling. Figuring that the extra $50 would be better spent on books, I decided to stick with the wi-fi only version. Besides, I was already in lust and didn’t want to be without it for 3-4 days. Although he is correct and I certainly should have no issues with keeping enough books on the Kindle for travel, I have twice found myself in the position of wanting to look up a book while having no access to wi-fi. In retrospect, I might have gone with the 3G version but it’s only a minor annoyance and I doubt I will have many regrets. Keep in mind that you also have free access to all AT&T Wi-fi Hotspots, so you still have wi-fi options while out and about.

The 5-way controller is probably the weakest link for me. Placement is fine but the active edge for moving the cursor is quite thin. If you have a tendency to fat finger things, you may buy a few books accidentally; whenever you look up a book, the BUY button is active. It wouldn’t be difficult to buy a book while trying to get to the links for downloading a sample or to look at the reviews. Luckily, upon buying a book, you are presented with a page that includes a link for returning an accidental purchase.

The MENU button provides a context aware menu for next actions. Press the button once to activate the menu. Press it a second time to close the menu. Examples of the menus available are shown below:



The BACK button acts like the back button on a browser; it returns you to the previous screen.

The HOME button will take you to the first screen of your book listing, whether you are currently in a book, shopping, or in one of the other book listing screens.

The SYM button provides access to special characters. Press the button to activate the menu, press again to close it. While the menu is open, the 5-way controller allows you to navigate among the options and the center button of the controller allows you to select the character to appear next. Please note that you must be in a context in which the Kindle is expecting input for the SYM key to do anything. If you’re reading and hit the SYM key, nothing happens. The result of pressing the SYM key is shown below:


The text key (represented by Aa) provides a variety of options. You can change the font size, the typeface, the line spacing, the number of words/line, and the rotation. You can also activate Text-to-Speech if the publisher allows it. See below:


The three typeface options are shown below:




The Text-to-Speech isn’t too bad. The reader has some inflection and it sounds fairly normal. You get the indicators of synthetic speech but it’s actually better than I expected, sounding better than the typical computerized voice that you would hear on your computer or on a child’s toy.

When you attach the Kindle to your computer, it mounts as a USB drive. Once mounted, you can drag documents or MP3 files to it (or take them off). If you purchase something or elect to install an archived item on the device (archived means any purchases that are in your library at the Kindle store but which are not currently installed on your Kindle), you don’t need the computer; it will happen via Whispernet (wi-fi). As you can see, the directory structure is quite straightforward and you should have no problem deciding which directory to drag the item into:


Along the bottom you have:

  • a volume control switch
  • a headphone jack
  • the USB connection
  • the on/off switch.

The on/off switch is very low profile and it’s not uncommon to think you have turned it on or off without actually accomplishing the task. To avoid this problem, there is a green light under the switch that lights up for a moment when you have activated it on or off. The same light acts as a charging indicator while you are plugged into a wall outlet or a computer. It will be yellow while charging and green when fully charged.

Finally, the battery life… Mine hasn’t sat long enough to determine how long the battery lasts when not using the Kindle. I consistently get a week+ on the battery while reading daily.


As mentioned earlier, the Home screen is where you will find the Samples and purchases. Ten books fit on a page, so you will get as many screens as it takes to display all of your titles. The previous and next page buttons are used to move between Home screens and the 5-way controller is used to navigate within a screen and to select a title for reading.

Home Screen

If you refer back to the first screenshot under the MENU button, you’ll see a shot of the Home screen. Note that there is a string of dots under each title. The length of that string indicates the relative length of that book. As you progress through a book, bold dots will indicate your current position within that book.

The Home screen allows you to change how your books are sorted. You can sort by:

  • Most recent first
  • Title
  • Author
  • Collections


Collections provide a way of combining like books (like a folder for books). If you refer back again to the Home screen under the MENU button discussion, you’ll see that there is an option to create a collection. Once you have created a collection, you are free to add as many books to that collection as you wish. A book can belong to more than one collection. To add a book to a collection, navigate to that book, then press the 5-way controller to the right. You will get a number of different options, as shown below:



Be careful, if you press the 5-way controller to the left, rather than to the right, you will get the option to delete that book from the device. This will remove it from the Kindle but the book will still be available in your archive.


To begin searching, just start typing. Next, use the 5-way controller to move over to the search context. You’ll find five options:

  • My items
  • Store
  • Google
  • Wikipedia
  • Dictionary

The Kindle would never be my chosen web surfing device but the browser works well enough for simple needs. As a research tool while reading, it provides a level of capabilities with which I can live. The results of the search (if searching My Items) presents each document containing your search text, as well as the number of times the text appears in that document:



As seen above, you can search for dictionary entries by keying in a word. While reading a book, you can get the definition by using the 5-way controller to navigate to the beginning of that word. A short definition will be presented right away. If you want a more detailed definition, hit the return key to be presented with a more complete display from the dictionary. There are actually two dictionaries provided on the Kindle. The default is the New Oxford American Dictionary. Also selectable as your dictionary of choice is the Oxford Dictionary of English. An example of the short and long dictionary options is shown below:



Highlighting/Notes/Social Networking

The Kindle allows you to create bookmarks, highlight text, and take notes. Any highlighting that you do or notes that you take, will appear in a file called My Clippings.txt. The file is visible in your Home screen for review on the Kindle. You can also copy the notes from your Kindle onto your PC or Mac by attaching the Kindle to your computer and then copying or dragging the file out of the Documents folder. Any highlighted text will appear in the file, fully annotated, like this:

The College Solution: A Guide for Everyone Looking for the Right School at the Right Price, (Lynn O’Shaughnessy)
– Highlight Loc. 215-16 | Added on Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 07:34 AM

While popular media has loudly touted the increased competition for admissions to our nation’s top colleges, the truth is, for many students, getting in isn’t the problem. It’s how to pay for college once you do get in.

You also have the option to see what others have highlighted in the book. If you have “Popular Highlights” turned on in the settings, you will see a light underline for highlighted text, with an indicator showing how many people highlighted that passage.

To highlight text, you use the 5-way controller to the beginning of the passage, then push the center button. Use the controller to continue highlighting the desired text. When you have the text highlighted, you have two options. If you press enter, the text will be highlighted and added to My Clippings. If you press ALT and Enter, you have the option to send that highlighted text as a Tweet or as a posting on Facebook (assuming you have setup your account within Settings). To link the Kindle to your Twitter or Facebook account, press the Menu button, then select Settings. Press the Next Page button and then navigate to the Social Networks option.


If a page has an image, it will display as a normal part of the page, as you would expect. Although the e ink screen is quite nice, it’s quite possible that the table or image will be too small to read. Use the 5-way controller to move the cursor to the image. When you get to the image, a graphic will appear in the center of the image that looks like a magnifying glass with a + sign at its center. Click the center square of the 5-way controller and the image will enlarge to fill the entire screen. The BACK key will return you to the original page. The below images come from: The One-Page Project Manager for Execution




The Kindle 3 supports the following content:

  • Kindle (AZW)
  • TXT
  • PDF
  • Audible (AA, AAX)
  • MP3
  • Unprotected MOBI
  • PRC

By using the Whispernet service and the, you can have Amazon convert the following content types to Kindle format:

  • HTML
  • Doc
  • TXT
  • RTF
  • JPEG
  • GIF
  • PNG
  • BMP

The service is free as long as you use wi-fi and the free e-mail address. The document will arrive within 5-15 minutes and you will get an e-mail at your registered e-mail address letting you know that the document is available.

Although the Kindle 3 supports PDF, you may decide that you want to convert PDF files via the free service. If you copy a PDF file to your Kindle, you will be able to read it but you will not have the same options under the Text button. You lose the ability to change:

  • Typeface
  • Font size
  • Line spacing
  • Words/line
  • Text-to-Speech

You instead get the options to:

  • Fit-to-screen (150%, 200%, 300%, actual size)
  • Contrast (lightest, lighter, default, darker, darkest)
  • Screen rotation

Converted files seem to get the same capabilities as purchased Kindle documents.

You can also download documents from the browser on the Kindle. Supported formats are:

  • Kindle (AZW, AZW1)
  • MOBI
  • PRC
  • TXT

Along with books, you can also read periodicals and blogs to which you have subscribed. This is not a feature that I have tested.


As an MP3 player, the Kindle 3 is OK. I heard some unexpected crackling but it wasn’t bad. If you don’t already have a player, it will work. Personally, I prefer to keep my music on my Touch and reserve my Kindle for documents.

I mentioned that the Text-to-Speech is pretty decent. It isn’t something I care to use at this point but my limited experience with it suggests that the voice is quite clear and should do the job if you cannot see the text or you just prefer to be read to. You won’t be getting James Earl Jones but you aren’t getting the full-on computer voice either. Just keep in mind that not all books permit the Text-to-Speech option. If you’re looking at the Kindle version of a book in the store, it will tell you whether or not the publisher is permitting Text-to-Speech.

The browser on the Kindle 3 is Webkit based, so it is more capable and faster than in previous versions. Below you will find a screenshot showing the default bookmarked sites, as well as a glance at IMDB.



It doesn’t have the pretty colors of a Nook Color but, as I said, I’m drinking the E Ink Kool-Aid.


I have to say that I’m quite impressed with how well the synch process goes. Even if you’re buying from the Amazon web page on your computer (or getting a sample), the transfer is quite fast.

More importantly, it’s quite useful. As an example, I was out with a friend the other night. We were talking about a book that I was reading on my Kindle. The Kindle was at home so I pulled out my iPhone, downloaded the book from the archives, and opened it to the page I had been reading. Within a few minutes (we don’t have 3G here, we are stuck with the lousy AT&T Edge) I was able to show him the passage we had been discussing. It worked without a hitch (except, as mentioned, the shitty Edge network).


Here are a few of the shortcuts I’ve found while playing with the Kindle 3:



There is no question that I love my Kindle and already see it as an indispensable tool. However, there are still a few things that piss me off.


Before I got my Kindle 3, pricing for ebooks was pretty good. Unfortunately, Apple really screwed the pooch when they released iBooks. When Apple agreed to the “Agency Model” pricing scheme set forth by publishers, Amazon lost the ability to set prices as it had when it was a benevolent dictatorship. It may well be that some books are cheaper now but I’m not seeing it. Here are several examples:

While traveling one day, and before getting my Kindle, I decided I would use the Kindle app on my iPhone to buy something to read. A friend had highly recommended The Lion’s Game by Nelson Demille. Expecting an inexpensive book, I found the book and was shocked to find the price set at $12.99. This is a book that was released in September, 2000 and it has apparently had a good run. The Amazon discounted paperback price is $10.19. What the hell? The publishers had argued that by letting them set prices, they would have the flexibility to make older books cheaper, while trying to capture a little extra revenue on the newer books. If this is an example, I’m missing it. Clearly, I’m an idiot but I fully expected the ebook version of a 10 year old book to be somewhere between $5 and $8.

Similarly, Altar of Eden by James Rollins was recently released in paperback format. The discounted Amazon price for the paperback is $8.29. The Kindle price is $8.99. You can pick the same book up at Sam’s Club for $6.49. I understand that Sam’s savagely discounts books but I again expected the price of the Kindle version to be somewhere between the Sam’s price and the paperback price. Unlike the price of The Lion’s Game, this one is new enough and the price close enough to the paperback that I might still be persuaded to pick it up.

Finally, yesterday I was looking at The 4% Universe by Richard Panek. Hardback price is $14.30. Paperback price is $10.85. Kindle price is $12.87. Again, I say, What The Hell? The book looks very interesting but the price turns me away.

Certainly, there is a convenience factor here. I don’t have to carry a bunch of books, nor do I have even more books clogging up my already overstuffed bookcases. The ability to synch between devices is also very nice. The other day, I wanted to show a book I was reading to a friend. I didn’t have my Kindle but had my iPhone. After launching the Kindle app, I was able to download the book from the archives to my iPhone and show him the passage where I was currently reading. Also very convenient.

What I don’t have is a tangible product that I can resell, give away, or loan. I have already purchased several e-books at $9.99 that I regret buying. Too late… That horse is out of the barn, the publisher has my money, and I have no way to recoup any of the money that I paid. With a physical book I would have the option to return it, sell it as a used book, or donate it. It seems to me that publishers are milking the ebook side of things, which is unfortunate.

If I find a book that I want to recommend to friends, they are compelled to buy it (or get it from a library) for themselves, rather than borrowing my copy. Ultimately, as more and more ebooks are sold, the publishers are putting themselves in a position where they are losing fewer sales to libraries and used book stores. Making older books available at a cheaper price is a way of recognizing this and appealing more to the avid readers who liked to share their books with friends and family. The beauty of an ebook is that, over time, the cost of a sale continues to decline. Publishers no longer have to worry about shelf space in a bookstore, so they can make more books available longer, rather than having to make the tough decision to take books out of print to reduce their printing, storage, and distribution costs. We, as readers should see some of that benefit. There are ways to crack the DRM and do whatever you want with the book but I would prefer to take the high road on this matter and ensure that the author gets his/her cut.

Here are a few more brief examples:

  • The Millenium trilogy books by Stieg Larsson are very popular. Although I have access to the paperbacks from a friend, I realized one day that
    The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and The Girl Who Played with Fire were available for the Kindle for $5. At that price point, it was a no-brainer; I picked them both up. However, The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest is selling for $9.99. That book remains on my wish list.
  • I have a friend who has been raving about Edward Rutherfurd’s New York for months. It doesn’t look like my kind of book but I have never heard such praise for a novel. He told me to get it for the Kindle. If I don’t like it, he will reimburse me for the cost. I told him that if the book cost more than $9.99 I would not buy it, despite his generous offer. When I checked, I found that it was also available for $5. Again, that was a no-brainer and it now waits for me on my Kindle.
  • Kindle samples are huge for me. If a book looks remotely interesting, I will download the sample. As time allows, I will pull up a sample and give it my full attention (much more attention than I would likely give the book while browsing in a bookstore). If I like the book, regardless of the subject matter, I will seriously consider buying it. An example of this is Chelsea Handler’s My Horizontal Life. After downloading the sample, I read it to my wife. We both laughed so hard that I immediately looked it up. When I saw it was $5, boom, another purchase. Will the rest of the book be as funny as that first section? I have no idea, but I’m willing to take that risk for $5.

So, here is my heuristic for purchasing e-books:

  • Is the cost greater than $9.99? If so, there has to be an extremely compelling need for the book. Otherwise…no purchase.
  • Is the cost between $7.00 and $9.99? If so, I will seriously consider buying the book but I might need a little time, research and thought.
  • Is the cost $5.00 or less? If so, and I’m interested in the book, it may very well be an impulse buy. At $5 or under, I am willing to take chances for an e-book that I probably would not take even for a similarly priced paperback.


In the previous section, I said that I cannot loan books. That is no longer completely true. If the publisher permits, you are now able to loan a book ONE TIME to someone. They get the book for 14 days and then the book reverts back to you. While they have the book, you cannot read it. The time limit makes perfect sense. The restriction that prevents you from also reading the book at the same time makes sense. Why can we loan a book only once? Believe it or not, I have more than one friend who likes to read the same books as I do. I have more than one friend who is using a Kindle or Kindle app to read books. As it stands right now, I have to decide which friend gets my coveted loaner and which ones are screwed. It seems to me that a number between 3 and 5 is more reasonable. A few friends can share a book but the limitation acknowledges that, over time, a book will degrade and at some point will be falling apart and no longer desirable as a loaner. If we’re going to get tagged these higher prices for ebooks, we should have more flexibility with what we can do with those books, short of breaking the law.

What are your thoughts on e-book readers and e-book costs? If you’re willing to share your opinion, I would appreciate it.

I’m Radium-Active


This won’t be terribly long. In previous posts, we’ve looked at Radio Gaga and Snowtape. Both are good apps for listening to online music, as well as to capture songs for your iTunes library.

Radium came to my attention when it was part of the MacBasket Mini-Bundle. I decided to try it out because there are some stations that I couldn’t seem to access with Radio Gaga or Snowtape. Specifically, I was looking for Windsor/Detroit’s 89X. I wasn’t able to get it with the previous programs but Radium brought it to me in all its glory.

If you’re looking for a program chock full of functionality, this isn’t the one for you. It plays Internet radio. Period. But, hey, I like that. My array of hard drives suggests that I don’t need to keep building my iTunes library. I had been listening to several web-based radio stations but was frustrated that most seem to use Flash to stream the programs and my experience with Flash has been less than optimal. Radium appealed to me because it allowed me to continue listening in a way that seems much more OS X friendly. Radium has not caused any system instability that I’ve come to expect while listening to Flash players.

When launched, Radium installs itself in the menu bar. There is no app clogging up your dock. You select radio stations from the menu bar and access preferences from there. wpid-voila_capture338-2010-12-8-17-372.jpg

Once launched, you’re ready to find a station. There are many stations included. You can also drag stations from iTunes or use URLs to link to the station. In the case of 89X, I couldn’t make that work. I tried to do a search but got impatient after a minute or two. I sent an e-mail to their support address and got a response within the hour. It seems I just hadn’t waited long enough. So, if you’re looking for a complaint, this is the only one: their search mechanism is a bit slow. After they suggested I do the search again, I tried to be more patient. Within 4-5 minutes, I had my station. TIP: If you want to save that station you found via search, just click the little heart to the left and it’s saved.

If you want to add a station via the URL, you get this window:


My results have been hit or miss with this option. I appreciate that it’s there and when it works, it’s great. My recommendation is that you first try the search option and be prepared to wait a few minutes. You can also request stations through support. Given how responsive they have been to me, that is a good option.

An unexpected bonus with Radium is that, like Snowtape, it can stream to Airport Express devices.


If you’re looking for it, Radium also provides an equalizer with 23 different settings. You can also create custom settings and save them.

As a quick glimpse, here are the preference options:


And…drum roll… If you have a subscription service, Radium may also be able to access that service:

The subscription that is missing from the screenshot is +

In a very, very unscientific comparison, I used the Activity Monitor to have a look system load generated by Radium, Radio Gaga, and Snowtape. I ran each program for an hour or two, checking the CPU load every 10-15 minutes. The results surprised me; I didn’t expect Snowtape to be the biggest hog:

Program CPU Load
Radium 1.1 – 2.2 %
Snowtape (not recording) 3.5 – 5.0 %
Snowtape (recording) 8.0 – 10.0 %
Radio Gaga (not recording) 1.5 – 2.5 %
Radio Gaga (recording) 3.5 – 4.5 %


Overall, the sound quality is good. The impact on system resources seems quite low. If you’re looking for a way to access your subscription service, or just a resource friendly way to listen to Internet radio, Radium is an excellent alternative.

You can find Radium here: (good until 9Dec2010) (good until 22Dec2010) (hopefully for years…)

Silverman vs. Munn Smackdown

OK, so part of the reason for doing this posting is to test  MarsEdit, a blogging app. The title sounds like a mud wrestling competition that a fair piece of geekdom might be interested in, but this is really about their respective books.


Sarah Silverman Book-1.jpg


Munn Book.jpg
















One day I found myself looking for something to read and was hoping to find something funny. I stumbled across the Olivia Munn book and was excited to get my hands on it. Munn has geek cred and, in the limited exposure I’ve had to her, seems funny. Plus, with a title (and cover) like that, how could I help but be interested? Then, after my encounter with Ms. Munn, I found the Sarah Silverman book. Since I’ve sort of made a habit of contrasting two different products, it seemed like a worthy entry.

Here is the  expected table:


In a rundown, Olivia’s title certainly beats out Sarah’s. It doesn’t have the soul-searing honesty of Sarah’s but it has a certain “imagery” to it that is more attention getting. The cover picture is a toss-up. Olivia is going for the cleavage angle but Sarah looks damn cute as one of the Beatles (or whatever the hell look she was going for).

Neither of these young ladies should kiss their mommas with those mouths. If you rate a book based on the number of references to penises, poop, farts, and vaginas, Sarah’s book may well be the book of the decade. If you are turned off by a constant barrage of expletives, these are not the books for you. I’ve heard that “The Hiding Place” and the Little House on the Prairie books are light on blue language but they also aren’t nearly as funny.

Both books provide an abundance of pictures. I flipped a coin and Olivia won. Without question, Olivia wins on the flip book front. Sarah can’t touch that ingenious little addition to Suck It. It’s like buying two books for the price of one.

Unfortunately for Olivia, when you actually start reading the book, Sarah wins. Hands down. Both women clearly love their families and both are comfortable with admitting their foibles. They each have a self-deprecating way about their writing that keeps things light. But…Olivia’s book reads like it was written by a high-school girl. It was an absolute chore to read through. In fact, in full disclosure, I could not finish the book (if someone can get me a signed copy, I’d be happy to give it another shot…). This is in contrast to Sarah’s book, which I completed in less than 24 hours. Although she dealt with some dark subjects (quickly), like bed-wetting and depression, they did not bog the book down. The book remained light, funny, and interesting from beginning until almost the end. There were two events in the book that were a little disgusting. The first revolves around Sarah and Louis C.K. dropping their clothing, one item at a time, into an apartment lobby from high up. They then get into the elevator, naked, and run around retrieving their clothes. I have to admit that the image is interesting, even compelling, until a naked Louis C.K. steps into the frame. At that point, my gag reflex is triggered (but I’m just not that into naked, balding, middle-aged red-headed men, YMMV). The other is a picture of a guy’s penis with a hair clip on it. In context, it’s funny but…

Perhaps it makes sense that Sarah would have a more “mature” “professional” book since she’s 10 years older and has earned her living as a writer, but I expected more from Olivia’s book. I wanted to love the Munn book. Too bad. Seriously, get me that signed copy and I will force myself to read it and revise this as appropriate…



Snag-bagging Songs on the Sly

Having a large music selection is a great thing. If you’re looking to evoke a certain mood, nothing works as well as music. With apps like iTunes, that allow you to generate Smart Playlists, you have a very flexible means for matching almost any mood…assuming you have the collection to back it up. You can build up your collection with the iTunes store or Amazon, but even at $1/song or $5/album, the costs build up quickly. This brings us to two programs that seek to help you build your music collection using Internet radio.

wpid-voila_capture191-2010-08-11-08-291.jpg vs. wpid-voila_capture192-2010-08-11-08-291.jpg

Radio Gaga and Snowtape are two apps that help you build your music library from a wide variety of internet based radio stations. Each has its strengths and each would serve the purpose for a different group of people.


When it comes to the interface, neither program screams sexy but both are clean and relatively intuitive.

Radio Gaga has an interface that is a little more attractive. By using buttons or frames, you get a graphic representation of the genres available. Double click on a genre frame to see a listing of the stations. The lower left corner has a controller and there is also a mini-controller available.

Snowtape is a bit more utilitarian. It also allows you to select based on genre, but without the pretty icons. It provides an additional link that allows you to buy a song that you are listening to in iTunes. This can be handy if you’re trying to support a specific artist or you have found a song that you want to get in pristine condition.

Radio Stations

Both apps provide a large collection of stations. They both will allow you to add stations via a URL or by dragging it from iTunes. Snowtape can go a bit further and can also load based on a playlist. Below is a listing of the genres available, as well as the number of stations/genre at the time that I was gathering the data.


In terms of station volume, Radio Gaga is the clear winner. However, bear in mind that many of the Radio Gaga stations that make up this huge selection are operating below 128 kbp. Those stations are great if you’re running with limited bandwidth. If you have a high-speed connection, the stations below 128 kbp sound like crap. If you’re using the app as a radio, it might be ok. If you’re trying to capture songs, forget it. The recordings will sound like an AM radio playing in a big metal cabinet.

As internet radios, the apps are pretty evenly matched to me. You may find a genre more readily in one app over the other (if you want Metal or Disco, you’ll have an easier time with Radio Gaga) but the both allow you to play and add stations.

It’s at this point, though, that the apps head down different evolutionary paths, which we’ll get to soon.


Here you can see the setup options for Radio Gaga. Pretty straighforward stuff. It does let you limit recording based on available hard drive space, which makes a lot of sense for Radio Gaga, as we’ll see.

Snowtape is more integrated with iTunes (allowing recommendations), has hot keys, permits you to set the format for recordings (AAC or MP3–various quality levels), limit bandwidth, and will let you use your Touch or iPhone as a remote (another point we’ll get to soon).


Both apps will let you record to your heart’s content and both will export the songs to iTunes with whatever tagging info is provided by the station. Radio Gaga does not provide the option to set the format (it saves to MP3) while Snowtape allows you to choose from four levels of AAC or three levels of MP3.

Radio Gaga

Radio Gaga provides more flexibility in recording. It allows you to set a schedule for recording (as long as the app is running). It allows you to filter for specific words in an artist name or song title. It also allows you to record multiple streams at once.

This screen shows that Radio Gaga organizes recordings by day. You can play the songs from here and you can export to iTunes from here. As mentioned, it only exports MP3 to iTunes.


Here you can see how the scheduling works. You select one or more stations and then pick a menu option to “Record On Schedule.” You control the date, the length of time for recording, and on which days it repeats. This can be very handy if you have a particular radio show you want to catch.

The limitation here is to an artist name or song name. As a test, I selected several rock stations and filtered on the band “The Kinks.” I selected several comedy stations and filtered on “Hedberg” to see if I could get Mitch Hedberg recordings. In fourteen hours of recording, I got one Kinks song and no Mitch Hedberg. Your mileage may vary. To be honest, I’m ambivalent about this capability. If I had a song that I desperately wanted, and I felt like having the app running all the time, I might use this functionality. I’m typically not that patient and I’ll have to think about any songs I might want that could be hard to find. Since I don’t know of any compelling Internet radio shows, the scheduling doesn’t do much for me either. For the right person, this seems like an excellent set of options that Snowtape does not provide.


Snowtape provides no scheduling or filtering capabilities. It cannot record multiple streams. What it does differently is: it finds artwork for the song and it allows “overlap recording.” Why is this important? Both programs do a decent job of getting the songs. The problem is that they key off the tagging information provided by the station. If there is a lag between the beginning/end of the music and the sending of the tag info, you may lose part of a song or may get extra. With the overlap feature, Snowtape will add 5 seconds to the beginning and end of recordings. You should be less likely to lose part of a song if you enable this option.

This screen shows a selection of songs that have been recorded, along with the artwork that was captured. Don’t like the artwork? Pick a song, then hit the “Change Album Artwork” button. You’ll get this window:


From here, you can select something else that suits your fancy. Of course, if you’ve picked up Pollux or TuneUp (Song Scrubber Showdown, Song Scrubber Showdown Updated, Genre Tagging — Pollux vs. TuneUp, Pollux vs. TuneUp Update), this isn’t terribly useful or relevant.

In recognition of the fact that this recording ability is not perfect, Snowtape provides an editor. When used in conjunction with the overlap function mentioned above, this provides your best bet of getting a full song by letting you record the extra and then delete if before exporting to iTunes.

Final Thoughts

I can’t really pick a winner on this one. Both apps provide an excellent means of beefing up your song library. Snowtape gets you the artwork and gives you a better shot of getting the whole song. Radio Gaga provides much better tools if you have radio shows you want to grab or if you want to go on hunting trips for specific artists or songs. Which product you choose will depend on your needs. Both will meet your needs but in different ways. If you want to stream to an Airport Express, Snowtape is your choice. And, if you do so, it will allow you to use your iPhone or Touch as the control, much like iTunes does. Here is a final matrix for your consideration.


In researching this, I saw that Snowtape is on sale “this week” for 50% off. Since it says “this week” and doesn’t actually set an end date, I don’t know how long the offer will last. To me, Snowtape has a slight edge in this contest. At $14.95, it looks even more attractive.

%d bloggers like this: